GeraWitness is not live yet — the service is not running, no reviews are being checked, and no payments are taken.
The prices, response times, SLAs and features on this page describe the service as planned for launch. They do not describe a service you can use today: nothing is for sale, and no review, SLA credit or cancellation described here is currently available. Join the waitlist and we will email you when early access opens.
Comparison · Updated May 2026
GeraWitness vs Surge AI
Surge AI annotates training data with crowd workers. GeraWitness will review live AI-initiated transactions with trained, SLA-bound specialists — approving or halting agent actions before they affect real people. Surge operates before deployment; GeraWitness is planned to operate in production. Both are part of a complete AI safety stack.
At-a-glance comparison
| Dimension | GeraWitness | Surge AI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Planned runtime review of live AI-initiated transactions | Training data annotation for ML teams |
| When used | Planned: in production — live transaction pipeline | Pre-deployment — data labelling workflows |
| Reviewer type | Planned: trained, rated, domain-specialist reviewers | Crowd workers selected by task |
| Real-time decision support | Planned — SLA-bound approve/flag/halt decisions | No — asynchronous annotation queue |
| Output | Planned: transaction approved, flagged, or halted with audit log | Labelled data for model training |
| Compliance support | Planned EU AI Act human oversight documentation and audit trails | Not positioned as compliance tooling |
| Integration | Planned: GeraNexus protocol + open API for external platforms | ML data pipeline integration |
Frequently asked questions
What does Surge AI do compared to GeraWitness?
Surge AI is a data annotation marketplace connecting machine learning teams with crowd workers to label training datasets. GeraWitness is planned to review live AI-initiated service transactions in real-time — approving, flagging, or halting actions before they complete. They operate at different stages: Surge before deployment, GeraWitness during live operation.
Does GeraWitness use crowd workers like Surge AI?
No. GeraWitness will use a trained, rated pool of reviewers with domain specialisation. Reviewer quality will be tracked and accountability enforced through planned SLA agreements. Crowd-source labelling platforms like Surge typically prioritise throughput over domain expertise; transaction review requires judgment from verified specialists.
Can Surge AI be used for real-time transaction review?
Surge AI is designed for asynchronous data annotation workflows — labelling batches of text, images, or audio. It is not designed for real-time decision gates in a live transaction pipeline. GeraWitness is being built specifically for sub-second to few-second decision routing in active service flows.
What is GeraWitness's SLA for review turnaround?
GeraWitness plans risk-tier-dependent SLAs: low-risk actions will route automatically, medium-risk actions will receive a reviewer decision within 60 seconds, high-risk within 5 minutes, and critical actions will be escalated immediately. The planned SLA will be contractual and tracked in reviewer performance metrics.
Is GeraWitness useful for companies not using Gera products?
GeraWitness is designed to integrate with the GeraNexus protocol, which is open to any service provider. Non-Gera platforms that deploy AI agents for bookings, payments, hiring, or service delivery will be able to integrate GeraWitness as their runtime human oversight layer.
Trust your AI agents at runtime
Planned: trained reviewers, SLA accountability, and full audit trails for live AI actions.
Request access