GeraWitness is not live yet — the service is not running, no reviews are being checked, and no payments are taken.
The prices, response times, SLAs and features on this page describe the service as planned for launch. They do not describe a service you can use today: nothing is for sale, and no review, SLA credit or cancellation described here is currently available. Join the waitlist and we will email you when early access opens.
Comparison · Updated May 2026
GeraWitness vs Scale AI
Scale AI labels training data and evaluates AI models before deployment. GeraWitness will provide human oversight for live AI-initiated transactions — when an agent books a service, makes a payment, or hires someone, a reviewer will be able to verify it before it executes. The two tools operate at different points in the AI safety stack and are used together by teams that need both pre-deployment evaluation and runtime oversight.
At-a-glance comparison
| Dimension | GeraWitness | Scale AI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Planned runtime oversight of live AI-initiated service transactions | Training data annotation and pre-deployment AI evaluation |
| When it operates | Planned — during active AI agent transactions | Pre-deployment — before models are in production |
| Output | Planned: approve / flag / halt individual transactions | Labelled datasets, model evaluations, RLHF feedback |
| Primary buyer | Service platforms deploying AI agents in high-stakes verticals | AI labs and enterprises building or fine-tuning models |
| Regulatory angle | Planned EU AI Act human oversight layer for high-risk AI systems | AI evaluation for model safety — different compliance layer |
| Integration point | Planned: GeraNexus protocol + any service platform exposing agent actions | Data pipelines and model training infrastructure |
| Risk tiers | Planned built-in risk classification (low/medium/high/critical) per action type | Task difficulty and quality tiers for annotation |
Frequently asked questions
What is the core difference between GeraWitness and Scale AI?
Scale AI is a data annotation and AI evaluation platform — it labels training datasets and helps companies evaluate AI model outputs before deployment. GeraWitness will provide human oversight for live AI-initiated transactions in the real world — when an AI agent books a home service, hires a worker, or makes a payment, a GeraWitness reviewer will be able to verify the action before it executes.
Does Scale AI review live transactions?
Scale AI focuses on training data pipelines, model evaluation, and pre-deployment testing. It does not provide a runtime oversight layer for AI agents executing real-world transactions. GeraWitness will operate at the transaction layer — reviewing and approving or flagging agent actions in real-time.
What types of actions does GeraWitness review?
GeraWitness will be integrated into the GeraNexus protocol and will review AI-initiated actions across Gera services: bookings, payments, hire requests, cancellations, and service-delivery verifications. High-risk or above-threshold actions will route to a human reviewer before execution.
Who performs reviews on GeraWitness?
GeraWitness will use a distributed pool of trained human reviewers. Reviews will be assigned based on the service category, risk tier, and language of the action. Reviewers will be verified, rated, and held to planned SLA targets. Scale AI also uses human annotators for their labelling workflows.
How does GeraWitness help with EU AI Act compliance?
The EU AI Act requires human oversight for high-risk AI systems, particularly those affecting employment, essential services, and credit. GeraWitness will provide a documented human-in-the-loop layer with audit trails, risk tier classifications, and reviewer accountability records that directly support compliance reporting.
Add human oversight to your AI agents
Planned runtime review layer for high-risk AI actions — EU AI Act ready by design.
Request access